On September 27, 1995, Mikhail Gorbachev’s Foundation convened the first State of the World Forum in San Fransisco. The former head of the Communist empire had gathered “nearly 500 senior states-people, political leaders, spiritual leaders, scientists, intellectuals, business executives, artists and youth from 50 nations to begin a process of deliberation on the central question of what priorities, values and actions should guide humanity as it moves into the next phase of development,” said Jim Garrison, President of the Gorbachev Foundation.

Thabo Mbeki (then deputy president) was one of the plenary speakers at this event. The ideas he espoused and those that he agreed with make some disturbing reading.

The ANC chief said he was pleased to attend on behalf of the poor and suffering people of Africa, who might otherwise not be represented in a “new world order” where “the world’s agenda is addressed only by the powerful.” Scary stuff. Here is that ‘new world order’ term popping up again. He also seemingly acknowledges that the world’s elite are in control of it.

In his keynote address, Mbeki went on to say:

“Global governance… must result in the erosion of the spheres in the conduct of states and governments. The “birth of the global village” will “force everyone to develop new perspectives.” It will also raise new issues such as :

* How “global governance should compensate [states or nations] for the reduction of their sovereign powers.”
* The “process by which consensus will be arrived at.”
* The “rewriting of the international agenda.”

Mbeki’s message fit the ideals expressed in various discussion groups. In the new global system, consensus would guide the action. But, as in this conference, only the chosen elite would participate in the consensus-building process. Outsiders had no voice. Yes, the masses would vote — at least at first. But unlike America’s representative government, the “elected” leader need not be accountable to individual concerns. Instead, individual rights would melt into a collective whole that, in the end, would serve the state and the elite who rule it. As in our new outcome-based, consensus-driven schools, a dissenting voice would be ignored, censored or worse. Synthesis, dialectics, common ground and compromise positions would pave the way to a global utopia.
(more…)

“For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents … to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”

- David Rockefeller, “Memoirs” autobiography (2002, Random House publishers), page 405

“In the age of globalization, states should give up some sovereignty to world bodies in order to protect their own interests”

By Richard Haass, President of the Council on Foreign Relations
Taipei Times, 21st February 2006

………………………………………………………………………………………

The Board of Directors of the Council on Foreign Relations is composed in total of thirty-six officers. Peter G. Peterson and David Rockefeller are Directors Emeriti (Chairman Emeritus and Honorary Chairman, respectively).

The Council’s stated mission is promoting understanding of foreign policy and America’s role in the world. Meetings are convened at which government officials, global leaders and prominent members debate major foreign-policy issues. It has a think tank that employs prominent scholars in international affairs and it commissions subsequent books and reports.

One of the goals stated on their website is to “Identify and nurture the next generation of foreign policy leaders”. This goal can be interpreted to mean that the CFR searches out the best and brightest, indoctrinates them in the proscribed doctrine, and then supports their selection to important positions in government, media and educational institutions. By this method, the CFR is guaranteed the loyalty of future leaders to perform their required duties to further the private aims of the CFR.

Through its membership, meetings, and studies, the CFR has been called the most powerful agent of United States foreign policy outside the State Department.

The Council has been the subject of many controversies, partly due to the number of high-ranking government officials in its membership, its secrecy clauses, and the large number of aspects of American foreign policy that its members have been involved with, beginning with Wilson’s Fourteen Points. The John Birch Society believes that the CFR plans a one-world government. Wilson’s Fourteen Points speech was the first in which he suggested a worldwide security organization to prevent future world wars.

The CFR has strong links with the secretive Bilderberg Group which is often accused of being the steering committee behind the plan to implement the New World Order. In addition the CFR is also linked to the RAND think tank which is often seen as the militaristic think tank of the NWO.

Paleoconservative Patrick J. Buchanan and others asserts the Council on Foreign Relations (itself alleged to be a front for international bankers, as well as, it is claimed, the inspiration for the founding of the Bilderberg Group, Trilateral Commission, and World Trade Organization) is behind the conspiracy of the New World Order.

He claims that the international banking interests are planning to eventually subvert the independence of the United States of America (and other states) by subordinating national sovereignty to the United Nations.

This thesis agrees with the right-wing libertarian opinion who sees a future socialist World State as the only way to achieve an Orwellian collectivist oligarchy freed from the need to subordinate the world’s production to the consumers of a free market economy.

The conspiracy would replace it with a monopolist planned economy capable of rationing the resources, converting populations into public property. Their usual image is an egalitarian slavery under a global scientific dictatorship.

The Council of Foreign Relations Theory is the latest version of the view that the Anglo-American Establishment conspired from 1900 on to gain world domination.

Why I am telling you about all this?

Well, in the coming weeks I will be providing evidence and the history of Mbeki and the ANC’s involvement with David Rockefeller, the CFR and their secret plans for introducing the aims of global government here in South Africa. I will be exposing the truth behind what is really going on with our government.